DoubleNest is the straightforward, flexible classic. Roo Double is lighter on paper, carries more, and arrives with hammock-end suspension hardware.
As an Amazon Associate, Worth Adding may earn from qualifying purchases.
Start with the hardware and setup you actually want to carry.
The ENO DoubleNest is the better general pick because it keeps the decision simple. ENO lists a 19-ounce weight, 400-pound capacity, 9-foot-6-inch by 6-foot-4-inch body, integrated stuff sack, aluminum carabiners, and compatibility with ENO hammock straps and stands. It is a well-defined route for a buyer who wants to choose the tree straps separately and build around a familiar gathered-end hammock format.
The Kammok Roo Double makes a persuasive specialty case. Kammok lists 17.1 ounces packed, a 500-pound maximum capacity, a 120-by-69.3-inch body, recycled 40D ripstop nylon, and two Dyneema Racer Slings plus two Kanga Claw carabiners in the box. That is meaningful value if those included hammock-end components fit your setup. Kammok still says tree straps are not included, so it is not an all-in hanging kit.
Neither published capacity answers every setup question. Site conditions, anchors, tree straps, knots, angles, wear, and the manufacturer instructions matter. This verdict favors the DoubleNest for its uncomplicated ecosystem and clear everyday fit, not because the Roo Double lacks thoughtful advantages.
Official dimensions, materials, capacity, packed size, and included parts—not prices or review scores.
The usable system includes the hammock, tree straps, anchors, and the routine you will repeat.
You want the familiar choice for relaxed campsite, backyard, travel, or festival lounging. Its 9-foot-6-inch body and 6-foot-4-inch width provide ample room to sit diagonally or share casual downtime, while the 19-ounce listed weight remains manageable for a non-ultralight camp kit. The attached stuff sack keeps packing tidy without adding a separate pouch.
ENO is especially sensible if you want to choose your own suspension. The company says its DoubleNest works with ENO hammock straps and stands; that makes it easy to match the hanging method to your destination rather than treating a partial hardware bundle as a complete setup.
Skip it if: the Roo Double’s lower packed weight, 500-pound published capacity, recycled fabric, or included slings and carabiners are the details that remove more from your shopping list.
You value a more complete hammock-end package. Kammok includes two Dyneema Racer Slings and two Kanga Claw carabiners, so the hammock itself arrives ready to connect to compatible tree straps. Its 17.1-ounce packed weight is 1.9 ounces below ENO’s stated figure, and its listed 500-pound maximum capacity adds margin for appropriate lounging use.
The 100% recycled, bluesign-approved GravitasX 40D diamond-ripstop nylon is another real differentiator for buyers who prioritize material sourcing. Kammok lists one-to-two people for lounging but recommends one person for sleep, which is a useful distinction when planning an overnight kit.
Skip it if: you prefer ENO’s broader strap-and-stand ecosystem, want a simpler classic layout, or do not need the included hammock-end hardware.
Concrete manufacturer-published details that can change a camp setup.
| Metric | ENO DoubleNest | Kammok Roo Double |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Simple ENO ecosystem, casual two-person lounging, choose-your-own suspension | Lighter carry, higher stated capacity, included hammock-end hardware |
| Model | DoubleNest Hammock | Roo Double Camping Hammock |
| Capacity | 400 lb / 181 kg | 500 lb / 226.8 kg |
| Body dimensions | 9 ft 6 in x 6 ft 4 in | 120 x 69.3 in |
| Packed dimensions | 6 x 4 x 5 in | 4.3 x 4.3 x 6.5 in |
| Listed weight | 19 oz / 538 g | 17.1 oz / 482 g |
| Fabric | FreeWave 70D nylon | 100% recycled GravitasX 40D diamond ripstop nylon |
| Included hardware | Integrated stuff sack and aluminum carabiners | Dyneema Racer Slings and Kanga Claw carabiners |
| Straps | Sold separately | Not included |
| Main drawback | Heavier on paper and lower published capacity | Tree straps excluded; overnight use recommended for one person |
These are direct competitors because both are compact gathered-end double hammocks intended for camping, travel, and relaxed outdoor use. The relevant choice is not a vague comfort claim. It is body size, stated capacity, packed size, weight, fabric, supplied hardware, tree-strap requirements, ecosystem, and whether the hammock supports the way you expect to set up.
ENO wins the broad recommendation because its specification set is easy to act on. It has a substantial 9-foot-6-inch by 6-foot-4-inch body, an integrated stuff sack, and a clear compatible family of straps and stands. A shopper can select the appropriate straps separately instead of receiving a partial system and assuming that it solves the anchor side of the equation. ENO’s 400-pound capacity and 19-ounce weight remain strong everyday figures.
Kammok wins several measurable points. It is 17.1 ounces packed, lists a 500-pound maximum capacity, uses recycled bluesign-approved fabric, and includes Dyneema slings plus Kanga Claw carabiners. For a buyer starting with no hammock-end hardware, those inclusions are meaningful. They do not erase the need for tree straps, and they should not be read as a compatibility guarantee with every anchor or accessory.
We treat published capacities carefully. They are useful for comparing the manufacturers’ stated limits, but a capacity number does not establish the condition of a particular tree, strap, carabiner, or installation. This page does not provide setup or safety advice. Read the current official instructions and inspect all components before each use.
That restraint is why the winner is not simply the product with the largest number. The DoubleNest gives most buyers the clearer path to a flexible, conventional hammock system. The Roo Double is the more compelling alternative when every ounce, included hammock-end hardware, recycled material, and the higher stated limit take priority.
Dimensions deserve context, too. ENO’s published body is a little longer and wider, while Kammok’s listed body is 120 by 69.3 inches and its packed cylinder is slightly narrower. Those figures help with pack planning and personal preference, but they do not predict comfort by themselves. Clothing, sleeping insulation, how a hammock is hung, and a person’s preferred diagonal position can change the experience. We therefore use dimensions to describe the products rather than declare a universal comfort winner.
ENO’s official DoubleNest page provides the 400-pound capacity, FreeWave 70D nylon construction, 9-foot-6-inch by 6-foot-4-inch dimensions, 6-by-4-by-5-inch packed dimensions, 19-ounce weight, integrated stuff sack, aluminum carabiners, and separately sold straps.
Kammok’s official Roo Double page provides its stated 500-pound capacity, recycled GravitasX 40D ripstop nylon, body and packed dimensions, 17.1-ounce weight, included Dyneema Racer Slings and Kanga Claws, separately required tree straps, use guidance, and lifetime guarantee.
Answers match the FAQ structured data on this page.
The ENO DoubleNest is the stronger default for most buyers because its 19-ounce listed weight, 400-pound capacity, 9-foot-6-inch by 6-foot-4-inch body, integrated stuff sack, and compatibility with ENO straps and stands make a simple, flexible package. Choose the Kammok Roo Double when its 17.1-ounce packed weight, 500-pound capacity, included Dyneema Racer Slings and Kanga Claw carabiners, recycled fabric, or lifetime guarantee better matches your use.
No. ENO says hammock straps are sold separately, and Kammok says straps are not included. The Roo Double includes two Dyneema Racer Slings and two Kanga Claw carabiners, but those are hammock-end hardware rather than tree straps. Confirm the manufacturer instructions and choose straps designed for the trees, anchors, and setup you plan to use.
Kammok lists a 500-pound maximum weight capacity for the Roo Double. ENO lists a 400-pound capacity for the DoubleNest. Capacity figures are manufacturer specifications, not a substitute for correct installation, compatible hardware, or following the brand instructions.
Kammok lists the Roo Double at 17.1 ounces packed, while ENO lists the DoubleNest at 19 ounces. The difference is modest. Consider the full carry system, including separately purchased tree straps, and whether the included Roo hardware replaces items you would otherwise pack.
ENO describes the DoubleNest as spacious enough for two and lists a 400-pound capacity. Kammok lists the Roo Double for one to two people when lounging but recommends one person for sleeping. Check each manufacturer’s instructions, capacity limit, and intended use before relying on either hammock for a shared overnight setup.